Sending Out Seventy Others

1. And after these things the Lord appointed seventy others also, and sent them two and two before His face, to every city and place whither He Himself was about to come.

2. Then He said to them, “The harvest [is] indeed much, but the workers [are] few; entreat you therefore the Lord of the harvest, that He may send out workers into His harvest.

3. Go you; behold, I send you out as lambs in [the] midst of wolves.

4. Carry neither purse, nor pack, nor shoes, and greet no one on the way.

The previous chapter may be thought of as a time during which the twelve disciples received intense preparation for ministry. Vital lessons were taught, multitudes were fed, and a voice from heaven instructed the disciples to “Hear Him.” The disciples were further instructed in what it would take to become a disciple, and how they must be willing to leave everything behind in order to follow Jesus. As we pointed out, “leaving everything behind” is not about abandoning one's family; nor is it about abdicating all responsibilities in order to follow Jesus. Rather, it's about abandoning self-interest, abdicating all desire for selfish gain, and, most importantly, it's about giving up the tendency to be led by oneself, choosing instead to be led by the good affections and true teachings that are from the Lord. ¹

The twelve disciples, however, were not the only ones that Jesus appointed to assist Him in His ministry. He now appoints seventy others to go before Him “into every city and place where He Himself was about to go”(10:1). Before sending them out, however, Jesus tells them, “The harvest truly is great, but the workers are few.” Therefore, Jesus encourages them to pray to the Lord of the harvest that He may send out workers into His harvest”(10:2).

A harvest of heavenly rewards

At the literal level, the “harvest” may be understood as a successful ministry in which many people are brought to acknowledge Jesus as their Lord and Savior. More deeply, however, the “harvest” also refers to the heavenly rewards that come to all who shun evils as sins against the Lord, and do good simply because it is good, with no thought of reward. While not directly sought, this “harvest of heavenly rewards” includes the reception of divine blessings such as peace, security, tranquility, love for others, and innermost joy.

This is truly a “great harvest” which is available to everyone who strives to keep the commandments. But doing the Lord's will is not always easy. While God is always present, supplying the power to keep the commandments, we must also do our part. There may be times, however, when the laborers in us are “few.” These inner laborers are the heavenly desires that are willing to do the necessary spiritual work. It is for this reason that the Lord encourages us to pray—especially, to “pray that the Lord of the harvest send out workers into His harvest.” ²

Jesus warns them in advance that this work will not be easy: “Behold I send you out as lambs among wolves”(10:3), He tells them. The “lambs” in us are the innocent states that desire to follow the Lord and live according to His teachings. These are the “workers.” On the other hand, the “wolves” in us are the hereditary tendencies toward evil that desire to destroy our innocent “lamblike” desire to follow the Lord and keep His commandments.

Knowing this, Jesus gives them further instructions: “Carry neither money bag, nor backpack, nor shoes,” He says. This refers to the importance of relying on the Lord rather than on oneself. As long as they remember that the Lord is with them to protect them from spiritual attacks, they will be safe. In place of their own faulty understanding, represented by “money bags,” they will be protected by truth from the Lord's Word. The Word of the Lord will be uppermost in their minds, and immediately present, not merely packed away in memory. Therefore, they will have no need for a “backpack.” ³

Neither will they carry “shoes” which cover the lowest parts of the body and therefore represent that which is lowest and most external in a person, especially the physical senses. Instead, their focus will be on that which is higher rather than lower, spiritual rather than natural, heavenly rather than earthly. The idea that shoes must be removed in the presence of holiness is a familiar theme throughout the Hebrew scriptures. As the commander of the Lord's army said to Joshua, “Take your shoes from off your feet; for the place whereon you stand is holy” (Joshua 5:15). And when Moses met the Lord at the burning bush, the Lord said to Moses, “Do not come any closer. Take your shoes from off your feet, for the place on which you stand, it is holy ground” (Exodus 3:5). ⁴

Filled with confidence in the Lord rather than in self, and imbued with a sense of their higher purpose, they are now prepared to go into the cities and towns to spread the good news and reap a harvest of heavenly blessings. Their sacred mission is to make disciples, not to make friends, to win souls for the kingdom, not to gain popularity. And so, Jesus cautions them, “greet no one along the way”(10:4).

Lessons about Reception and Rejection

5. And into whatever house you enter, first say, Peace to this house;

6. And if indeed the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it; but if not, it shall return upon you.

7. And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as are with them; for the worker is worthy of his wage. Do not pass on from house to house.

8. And into whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat what is set before you,

9. And cure the weak that are in her, and say to them, The kingdom of God is near to you.

10. But into whatever city you enter, and they receive you not, going out into her streets, say,

11. 'And the dust which sticks to us from your city we do wipe off against you. Nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God is near to you.'

12. And I say to you that it shall be more tolerable for Sodom in that day than for that city.

13. Woe to thee, Chorazin! Woe to thee, Bethsaida! For if the [works of] power had been done in Tyre and Sidon which have been done in you, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes.

14. But it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the judgment than for you.

15. And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted even to heaven, shalt be thrust down even to hell.

16. He that hears you, hears Me, and he that spurns you, spurns Me; and he that spurns Me, spurns Him that sent Me.”

As Jesus continues His teaching, He gives specific instructions about what to do as they enter someone's home. He puts it like this: “Into whatever house you enter, first say, 'Peace to this house'”(10:5). It means that we wish for this person, and for this person's household, every heavenly blessing. Jesus then adds, “And if indeed the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it; but if not, it shall return upon you”(10:6). The scriptural phrase “son of peace” refers to something from God which is with a person. This could be a truth from sacred scripture, or an innocent desire to learn, or even a sincere desire to be a better person. All of this can be signified by the scriptural phrase, “son of peace.” ⁵

As they go from house to house, endeavoring to deliver the gospel message, they may be invited in or rejected. Being invited to enter someone's house corresponds to entering a person's mind, endeavoring to understand that person as deeply as we can. As we begin to enter, with the greatest respect for others, we will listen to their perspectives and points of view, appreciating how they see spiritual matters. As Jesus says, “In the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as are with them”(10:7).

Earlier, we mentioned that in sacred scripture the term “worker” signifies those parts of ourselves that are willing to do the work of regeneration. At first, these heavenly “workers” in us are few, even though the harvest of heavenly rewards is great. Nevertheless, the seventy missionaries who go out to spread the message of the gospel represent those states in ourselves that are willing to do spiritual work; and the people who receive these missionaries, welcoming them into their homes, represent those states in us that are willing to be instructed.

In order to be instructed, however, we must be willing to put aside our limited viewpoints long enough to appreciate the good and truth that is presented to us. When we are in this kind of receptive state, we will be open not only to the goodness and truth that come to us directly through the Word, but also to the goodness and truth that come to us indirectly through others, regardless of their religious viewpoint. When we are in states of receptivity like this, we experience the heavenly rewards for the work we do. As Jesus puts it “The worker is worthy of his wage.” And we should strive to remain there in that state of receptivity and not pass out of that state. This is the deeper meaning of Jesus' statement, “Do not pass from house to house.” Instead, Jesus says, “Whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you”(10:8). ⁶

As a result, “the weak [places in us] are cured, and the kingdom of heaven has come near”(10:9)

Dealing with rejection

But what if we are not received? What if people do not want to hear the message we came to bring? What does this teach us about our inner world? It suggests that there are states in us that have no desire to learn, no wish to be instructed, and no yearning for self-improvement. In fact, these states may reject any mention of those things. That's because these states are chiefly concerned with those things that are merely natural. This focus on what is merely natural is compared to the lowest and most lifeless of all forms of matter: dust.

Therefore, Jesus tells His messengers, “Whatever city you enter, and they do not receive you, go out into its streets and say, 'The very dust of your city which clings to us, we wipe off against you'”(10:11). In these words, Jesus is warning us about getting caught up in the cravings of our lower nature. Like dust, we should shake off these cravings so that they do not cling to us. ⁷

Jesus then speaks about the fate that will come upon those cities who reject the message of the gospel: “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida . . . and you Capernaum, who are exalted to heaven, you will be thrust down to hell”(10:12-15). These are words of strong condemnation for those who reject the gospel. Jesus, however, assures the disciples that these rejections do not mean that the seventy have been unsuccessful. Jesus makes this quite clear when He says, “He who hears you hears Me, and he who spurns you spurns Me. And he who spurns Me spurns Him who sent Me”(10:16). ⁸

Literally seen, this episode is about effective missionary work. In brief, it's about carrying out the mission, trusting in the Lord, and not worrying about rejection. If we are truly speaking the Lord's words, it is the Lord that people are rejecting, not us. For this reason, we need not spend a lot of time with people who are determined to resist the message we offer. We can simply shake off the dust and move on.

But there is a deeper lesson within these words. Notice how often Jesus refers to a city that either receives or rejects the seventy. Jesus says, “Whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat such things as they set before you.” Also, “Whatever city you enter, and they do not receive you,” that city will be “condemned” and “cast down into hell.” In sacred scripture, a city signifies the human mind, and especially one's understanding of doctrine. A strong “city” signifies the human mind when it is fortified with genuine truth. These truths serve to protect us against false teachings. But a weakly fortified city represents a human mind that is closed to the Lord's truth and built upon false teachings. As it is written in the Hebrew scriptures, “We have a strong city; we are surrounded by the walls and bulwarks of God's salvation (Isaiah 26:1).” On the other hand, weakly fortified cities represent human minds that are filled with falsity because they refuse to let in the Lord's truth. These “cities” are made up of houses that are “shut up” like closed minds. Therefore, it is written, “The city of emptiness is broken; every house is shut” (Isaiah 24:10). ⁹

Therefore, while Jesus seems to be speaking about rejecting those people who refuse to hear us, the deeper message is about those states in us that refuse to hear the gospel message—those states that are closed to the gospel message like houses that are empty and shut. In other words, whenever goodness and truth come to us, knocking on the door of our minds, offering peace and joy, we should be ready to open the door and say, “Come on in.” If, however, we refuse to open the door, we should realize that we are not only rejecting the message, but we are also rejecting the One who is sending the message to us. “Whoever hears Me,” says Jesus, “also hears the One who sent Me.”

A practical application

The choice is always before us. We can ignore the divine promptings and heavenly messages that come to us through the Word and through the goodness in others, or we can reject them. Unlike evil cravings that force themselves upon us, heavenly desires do not force entry. But if we choose to allow them in, the harvest is great, and the workers are entitled to their wages—the rewards of heavenly peace. This is what happens every time we open the door and admit the Lord of the harvest who enters saying, “Peace to this house.”

The Return of the Seventy

17. And the seventy returned with joy, saying, “Lord, even the demons are obedient to us in Thy name”.

18. And He said to them, “I beheld Satan, as lightning, falling from heaven.

19. Behold, I give to you authority to tread on serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing whatever shall hurt you.

20. Nevertheless rejoice not in this, that the spirits are obedient to you, but rather rejoice that your names are written in the heavens.”

21. In that same hour Jesus leapt for joy in Spirit, and said, “I profess Thee, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because Thou hast hidden these things from the wise and intelligent, and hast revealed them to infants; yes, Father, for so it was [for] good pleasure before Thee.

22. All things are delivered up to Me by My Father; and no one knows who the Son is, except the Father, and who the Father is, except the Son, and [he] to whom the Son intends to reveal [Him].”

23. And turning to the disciples by themselves He said, “Happy [are] the eyes which look upon what you look upon.

24. For I say to you that many prophets and kings willed to see what you look upon, and have not seen [them], and to hear what you hear, and have not heard [them].”

Innermost peace is protection from the evil and falsity that rise up from hell. When we are in this peace, we are secure and at rest, knowing that no evil spirit, and no demon can approach us. In this state of inner peace, we also experience the blessings of heavenly joy. And so, the next episode begins with a description of what the seventy experienced as they returned from their missionary endeavors. As it is written, “The seventy returned with joy,” saying to Jesus, “Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name”(10:17).

Jesus assures them that this is indeed the case, saying, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.” Jesus then adds further assurance: “Behold, I give you the authority to trample on serpents and scorpions and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means hurt you”(10:18-19).

These promises must have been received with great joy. Although the messengers had only a literal understanding of these words, thinking that they would have power over their natural enemies and be able to trample on serpents without being injured, Jesus' words also contained a great depth of inner meaning. Jesus' statement that He saw “Satan fall like lightning from heaven,” refers to the conquest of truth over falsity. Every false teaching that was destructive of heavenly truth was cast down from the heaven in human minds. The idea that demons were subject to the seventy “in Jesus' name” means that heavenly qualities such as love, courage, understanding, and generosity would now rule over the demonic attributes of hatred, fear, intolerance, and greed. The assurance that they would “trample on serpents” means that lower desires could now be subjugated to higher loves. In brief, Jesus had come to restore order in the universe, insuring that good would prevail over evil and truth over falsity. ¹⁰

Deeper joy

Jesus is quick to remind them, however, that this kind of power comes from the Lord alone. First of all, Jesus turns to the seventy and tells them that their rejoicing should be placed in proper perspective. “Do not rejoice in this that the spirits are subject to you,” Jesus tells them, “but rather rejoice because your names are written in heaven”(10:20). This is the blessed assurance that will enable them to continue their work regardless of results, and in spite of rejection. No demon will be able to bring them down or discourage them; no false teaching will deter them from following the truth; no selfish craving will divert them from their scared calling. This is a heavenly guarantee that no lasting harm can come to us as long as we faithfully carry out our mission, trusting in Him who sent us, and praying for His support and guidance along the way.

This is a different kind of joy. It is deeper and more lasting than the kind of joy that comes from earthly success. This deeper joy, known as “the joy of the spirit” can only be attained through communion and cooperation with God. It comes in moments of profound gratitude when we praise God for every good thing He has done through us and for us. As it is written, “In that hour Jesus rejoiced in the Spirit, and said, 'I praise You, Father, Lord of heaven and earth'”(10:21). And turning to His disciples, Jesus spoke to them privately, saying, “Blessed are the eyes which see the things you see. For I tell you that many kings and prophets have desired to see what you see, and to hear what you hear, and have not heard it”(10:23-24). ¹¹

Truly, the disciples had seen wonderful things with their physical eyes, and had heard wonderful things with their physical ears. They had seen lepers cleansed, people healed, multitudes fed, demons cast out, and people raised from death to life. But something even deeper was going on as Jesus was patiently opening their understanding: He was enabling them to “see” spiritual truth for themselves and to comprehend the wonders of spiritual reality.

Jesus' method is always gradual and indirect, teaching by example and parable so that those who think themselves “wise and prudent” will not understand, while those who have the innocent faith of a child will see and comprehend. As Jesus puts it as He continues His prayer to the Father, “You have hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and revealed them to the babes”(10:21). ¹²

The Parable of the Good Samaritan

25. And behold, a certain lawyer stood up tempting Him, and saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”

26. And He said to him, “What is written in the Law? How readest thou?”

27. And he answering said, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God out of thy whole heart, and out of thy whole soul, and out of thy whole strength, and out of thy whole mind, and thy neighbor as thyself.”

28. And He said to him, “Thou hast answered rightly; this do, and thou shalt live.”

29. But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

30. And Jesus, taking up [his question], said, “A certain man came down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers, who having stripped him and having inflicted blows on [him] went away, leaving [him] [when] he was half dead.

31. And by chance, a certain priest came down by that way, and seeing him, passed by on the other side.

32. And likewise also a Levite, when he was at the place, came and saw, and passed by on the other side.

33. But a certain Samaritan, [as] he journeyed, came upon him, and seeing him, was moved with compassion.

34. And coming near, he bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and he set him on his own beast of burden, [and] brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

35. And going out on the morrow, he set out two denarii, gave [them] to the host, and said to him, 'Take care of him, and whatever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.'

36. Which now of these three thinkest thou was neighbor to him that fell among robbers?”

37. And he said, “He that did mercy with him.” Then Jesus said to him, “Go, and do likewise.”

Jesus taught through parables. It is a divine way of revealing truth to those who are willing and ready to receive (“babes”), while simultaneously concealing the truth from those who would pervert and distort it (“the wise and prudent”). Perhaps the most famous of all parables is the “Parable of the Good Samaritan.” While it is usually taught as a lesson on the importance of loving the neighbor, we will see that much more is involved, especially when we consider it in the context of the continuous spiritual sense of this gospel. ¹³

The backstory to the Parable of the Good Samaritan is found in the previous chapter. In that chapter, Jesus and His disciples had encountered the Samaritans on their way to Jerusalem. This was just before the sending out of the seventy. In that episode it is said that the Samaritans did not receive Jesus “because His face was set for the journey to Jerusalem” (Luke 9:53).

Notice the words, “Because his face was set for the journey to Jerusalem.” This is also translated, “They did not receive Him because He was heading towards Jerusalem.” The implication is that Jesus was headed towards the temple in Jerusalem to worship. At the time, there existed a deep-seated and long-standing hatred between the Samaritans and the Jews. This animosity was based on an ancient dispute about where the temple should be, on Mt. Zion in Jerusalem or on Mt. Gerizim in Samaria. The fact that Jesus was “headed towards Jerusalem” was taken as an insult to the Samaritans. To them it seemed that He believed that the temple in Jerusalem was the proper place to worship, and not on Mt. Gerizim in Samaria.

Also, because the Samaritans interbred with people of other cultures they were considered “half-breeds” (half Jew/half Gentile) and because they worshipped idols, they were considered pagans. There was, therefore, a long history of hatred and contempt between Samaritans and Jews.

This cultural clash, however, was an ideal opportunity for Jesus to teach His disciples a timeless lesson about the need for being inclusive. Even though they were rejected by some in Samaria, the disciples were told that they should not respond with anger or vindictiveness. In the preceding chapter, when James and John wanted to “call down fire from heaven” upon the Samaritans, Jesus forbade them, saying “You know not what manner of spirit you are of” (Luke 9:55).

It is noteworthy that this hostile encounter with the Samaritans is recorded only in the Gospel According to Luke. It does not occur in any other gospel. Similarly, the “Parable of the Good Samaritan” occurs only in Luke. Evidently, there is an important link between these two episodes which occur so closely to each other in this gospel. In order to explore that link more deeply, we need to take a closer look at the Parable of the Good Samaritan.

Who is my neighbor?

The Parable of the Good Samaritan begins when a lawyer approaches Jesus and asks, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?'”(10:25). In those days a person who was considered to be a “lawyer” was an expert in religious law. The lawyer, therefore, was not looking for instruction from Jesus. He was already an expert. Instead, he was testing Jesus, seeking to find fault with Jesus' teachings. In response, Jesus simply turns the question back on the lawyer, asking him, “What is written in the law? And what is your reading of it?”(10:26). Quoting from both Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18, the lawyer says, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself”(10:27).

This, of course, is exactly the right answer. But Jesus also knows that “right answers” are not enough. So, He says to the lawyer, “You have answered rightly; do this and you will live”(10:28). The lawyer, apparently, is more interested in having a theological debate about scripture than in doing what scripture teaches. In fact, the text tells us that he wanted to “justify himself,” perhaps to make excuses for why his very limited idea of what it means to “love the neighbor” is preferable to Jesus' broader, more universal perspective. So, the lawyer asks Jesus, “Who is my neighbor?”(10:29).

This lawyer, it must be remembered, is “testing” Jesus. In fact, the parable begins with the words, “a certain lawyer stood up and tested Him.” The lawyer was trying to outsmart Jesus; he wanted to show that Jesus' gospel of universal love directly contradicted the Hebrew scriptures. After all, Jesus had recently proclaimed that we should love our enemies, do good to those who hate us, bless those who curse us, and pray for those who injure us (Luke 6:27-28). If these ideas were to become widely known and accepted, it would undermine the literal teachings of the Hebrew scriptures which seemed to be quite clear about how to treat enemies.

For example, David said, “I hate them, O Lord, who hate You. . . . I hate them with perfect hatred. I count them my enemies” (Psalm 139:21-22).

In Amos we read,

“Hate the evil, and love the good” (Amos 5:15).

And in the passage from Leviticus that the lawyer was quoting, the wording closest to the original Hebrew reads,

“You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people. But you should love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18).

So, in the context of strict rabbinical law, the question, “Who is my neighbor?” was clearly defined. The “neighbor” was someone from your own family or tribe, one of “the sons of your own people.” Quite literally, this referred to immediate relatives, or perhaps, if extended a little, it might also include one's religious group.

But the idea that “a neighbor” might also extend beyond one's family or religious circle—even to go so far as to include “outsiders” and “strangers” and “enemies”—was unthinkable. Samaritans were neighbors only by proximity. According to Jewish law, showing kindness to people who worshipped “other gods” was considered blasphemy. And the consequence was not kindness but destruction. As it is written, “He who sacrifices to any god, other than to the Lord alone, shall be utterly destroyed” (Exodus 22:20).

This is the religious background to the lawyer's question. The lawyer knew full well that the rabbinical definition of a neighbor was limited to one's family, tribe, and religion, “one of the sons of your own people.” As was His custom, Jesus does not answer the lawyer's question directly. Instead, He tells him a story about “a certain man who went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead”(10:30). The wounded man represents all people who have been deprived of spiritual protection. Their understanding of basic goodness has been stripped away from them (“stripped him of his clothing”), and they are therefore vulnerable to the most vicious attacks of hell (“wounded him”). Spiritually, the lawyers and religious leaders of that time had so twisted and perverted the genuine truths of religion that the people were spiritually wounded, brokenhearted, and “half dead.” ¹⁴

As the parable continues, we learn that a priest and a Levite are described as passing by, but neither one stops to help the wounded man. Instead they both “pass by on the other side”(10:32). The priest and the Levite represent all forms of religious leadership in which the importance of doctrine, and the administration of sacraments takes precedence over relieving the pain of the poor and the oppressed. Though both the priest and the Levite “saw” the wounded man, and were therefore aware of his suffering, they did nothing to help him. They were unable and unwilling to show compassion.

We can imagine that the lawyer is growing somewhat defensive as he listens to the story. After all, it is his job to support the work of the priests and the Levites, and to help them interpret the temple laws. Priests and Levites are busy people, with important jobs, and critical responsibilities. Moreover, stopping to touch the wounded man who might even be dead would make them ritually impure, unable to perform their temple duties. Therefore, according to religious law, stopping to help would be strictly forbidden.

But the story does not stop here. Jesus continues: “However, a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was. And when he saw him, he was moved with compassion, and went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn and took care of him”(10:33-34). If the lawyer had already begun to grow defensive, the mention of a despised Samaritan—especially depicting him as being morally superior to a priest or Levite—surely would have vexed him.

The parable continues to extol the exemplary morality of the Samaritan who continues to care for the wounded man: “On the next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said to him, 'Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you'”(10:35).

The words “when I come again” have an unmistakably apocalyptic ring to them—announcing the end of times when Jesus will “come again” to reward the just. The Samaritan, then, represents the Lord Himself, coming again, pouring on the oil of love and the wine of truth. And as He does so, He says to all who have truly loved their neighbor as themselves, “I will repay you.” ¹⁵

As the lesson draws to a close, Jesus returns to the lawyer's original question, “Who is my neighbor?” The parable itself contains the answer, but Jesus wants the lawyer to discover it for himself. Therefore, Jesus says to him, “So, which of the three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?”(10:36).

If the lawyer thought that he was going to trap Jesus in a scriptural technicality about defining “the neighbor,” he was wrong. Jesus, in fact, uses this as an opportunity to teach a lesson about universal moral law—a law so engraved on the human heart that it transcends, race, nation, and religion. It is the law of mercy, of human brotherhood, and of compassion for all who suffer—especially those who are in emotional and spiritual pain. As Jesus said in His first public address, “I have come to heal the brokenhearted” (Luke 4:18).

In His wonderful restating of the question, Jesus demonstrates that our real concern should not be about defining who our neighbor is, but rather about being a neighbor. In the parable that Jesus tells, the true neighbor turns out to be the compassionate Samaritan. Although this Samaritan did not fit the strict definition of a neighbor, that is “the son of one's own people,” he was the one who was neighbor to the man who fell among thieves. He was the neighbor because he was the one who showed mercy.

While the Samaritans may have—as a group—despised the Jews, there were some among them who could rise above racial and religious prejudice. These are the people in every community, in every nation, and in every religion who encourage and support what is good in others, pouring on the oil of love and the wine of truth. These are the ones who show mercy, regardless of faith differences. These are the Good Samaritans. ¹⁶

“So, which of the three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among thieves,” asks Jesus. And the lawyer is left with but one reply. Unable to mention the hated name, “Samaritan,” all the lawyer can say is, “He who showed mercy on him”(10:37). But that is enough. Jesus is now ready to give him the final message of the parable, which is also the conclusion of this episode, “Go and do likewise”(10:37).

A practical application

The Parable of the Good Samaritan is a classic example of what it means to live the life of religion, not just to study it or talk about it. It is an ancient story with a timeless message. It would not help us, however, to keep our focus on the historical facts, especially if doing so encouraged feelings of contempt for misguided religious leaders. Instead, it is more important to look deeper, observing the scribes and Pharisees within ourselves. These are the false thoughts and evil tendencies that rise up from hell, beckoning us to despise others who do not worship as we worship, think as we think, or do as we do. The truth is that everyone, in one way or another, is on their own journey from Jerusalem to Jericho, and everyone gets wounded along the way. This is the universal journey that we all are called to make. It is the difficult journey from higher understanding (Jerusalem) to the fruitful plains of Jericho where truth is put to use. Learning the truth is one thing, but putting it into our lives and “bearing fruit” is much more difficult. It's good to know that there are “Good Samaritans” everywhere who are willing to help us get back up on our feet, people who will support and encourage the good in us, so that we might continue our journey to Jericho. ¹⁷

First Things First

38. And it came to pass as they went, that He entered into a certain village; and a certain woman named Martha received Him into her house.

39. And she had a sister called Mary, who also sat at the feet of Jesus, and heard His Word.

40. But Martha was concerned about much ministering, and standing by said, Lord, dost Thou not care that my sister has left me to minister alone? Tell her, therefore, that she should help me.

41. And Jesus answering said to her, Martha, Martha, thou art anxious and fretful about many things;

42. But one thing is needful, and Mary has chosen that good part which shall not be taken away from her.

At the end of the previous episode, Jesus gave the lawyer a specific command. It could not have been more simple or more direct. Just four words: “Go and do likewise.” The literal sense of this story teaches natural charity. It's about our basic, fundamental concern for others. We are to love our neighbor as ourselves. The Good Samaritan showed compassion. And we are to “Go and do likewise.” It is the perfect answer to the lawyer's question, “Who is my neighbor?”

Each of us is called to be neighbor to others when they fall among spiritual thieves who attempt to rob them of their faith. Each of us is called to support and encourage what is good in others. This is one of the central messages in the Parable of the Good Samaritan.

But we would make a serious mistake if we overlooked the lawyer's first question: “Teacher,” he said, “what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” The answer was twofold. The second part was to love your neighbor as yourself. This important teaching was beautifully illustrated in the parable which followed. But the first part—the more significant part of the answer—should not be forgotten: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind.”

It is always possible to overemphasize either part of this two-fold command. Too much attention to prayer, devotion, and religious ceremony to the exclusion of meeting the fundamental needs of our neighbors makes a mockery of religion. The priest and the Levite who “walked by on the other side” represent this kind of over-emphasis on what people believe is “loving the Lord.” In actuality, when worship of God does not lead to loving the neighbor, it is not worship at all. ¹⁸

On the other hand, we can also err on the side of too much service. When our charitable actions are disconnected with our love for God and our total dependence on Him, we get worn out. As a result, we can become anxious, nervous, and worried about many things. We can get cranky and irritable. We become the wounded man on the side of the road, half-dead with exertion. Therefore, in keeping with these perfectly ordered episodes, the next story focuses our attention on sitting at God's feet, stilling the mind, and listening to His word—a pre-requisite for loving the neighbor.

Sitting at Jesus' feet

The story begins as Jesus and His disciples enter a village. “And a certain woman named Martha welcomed Him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary, who also sat at Jesus' feet and heard His word”(10:38-39).

The two sisters represent the two aspects of every human being. Mary represents the part of us that hungers to hear God's word, the part that simply wants to sit by His feet, absorb His wisdom, and be led by Him. But Martha represents a different part of us. She is the part that is busy serving, trying to be helpful, gracious, and accommodating. It's the part of us that cares about others and wants to make them happy, but is often so pre-occupied with service that it forgets to rest in God. In other words, “Martha was distracted with much serving”(10:40).

Like many of us, Martha finds herself so consumed by her duties that she can no longer cope. She feels overwhelmed by all she has to do, and she resents the fact that Mary is not helping. So, she approaches Jesus and says, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? Therefore, tell her to help me”(10:40).

Martha's situation reminds us that we need to be careful about our priorities and commitments. While we are indeed here to serve others, and while we can find our greatest joy in unselfish service, we should also take time to rest in the Lord, sitting at His feet and listening to His Word. If we neglect this essential part, we will end up feeling burnt-out and burnt-up. As we have seen throughout this gospel, taking time to develop our faith, including reading the Word and pausing to pray, is absolutely essential before attempting to do anything that is good. Service that is not filled with God's love is empty. The internal must precede and infill the external. ¹⁹

Ever merciful, and filled with understanding, Jesus speaks gently to Martha, saying, “Martha, Martha, you are worried and troubled about many things. But one thing is needed, and Mary has chosen that good part, which will not be taken away from her”(10:42).

The trouble with Martha is that she neglected the essential thing—the “one thing that is needed.” Martha, then, represents the part of us that may be frantically trying to do good, but has not stopped to rest in God so that God can work though us. Whenever we become overly concerned with domestic issues and business matters, forgetting to take time for God, we miss out on “the good part.” ²⁰

In our eagerness to do the right thing, we may neglect the essential, which is to approach God, sit at His feet, and prayerfully reflect on His Word. It is often in the silence, when we have stopped the mental chatter about domestic and business concerns, when God speaks most clearly to us, giving strength and direction. Without that essential guidance, we may find ourselves busy doing many things, volunteering for many activities, and serving in various ways—to the point of exhaustion. Without God in our lives, and the gentle inspiration of His Word, the decisions that we make in those various capacities may not be wise, or truly loving.

It is, in the end, Mary who has chosen the good part. When our choices in life are based on our understanding of the Word, God can work with us, and through us, directing us, and inspiring us in everything we do. Kindled by His love, we will not burn out; enlightened by His wisdom, we will not walk in darkness.

Whenever this happens, and wherever this happens, the good that we do will be truly good because it will come from first going to the Lord. It will be the Lord's goodness working through us. That's why Mary has the good part. ²¹

Footnotes:

4844. 'Remain a widow in your father's house' means the alienation of this Church from the Jewish Church. This becomes clear from the fact that Judah's wish was that by doing this she would go away and not return to him any more. He did, it is true, say that she should remain there until Shelah his son was grown up; nevertheless he had it in mind not to give her to Shelah his son, for he said to himself, 'In case he also dies, like his brothers'. He gave further proof of his intentions by his actions, as is evident from verse 14 - 'Tamar saw that Shelah had grown up, and she had not been given to him as a wife'. From all this it is evident that the words used here mean that he alienated her from himself. That is, the meaning in the internal sense is that he alienated the Church representative of spiritual and celestial things - the Church represented by 'Tamar', 4811, 4831 - from the Jewish Church represented by 'Judah'. The two could not be in agreement with each other because Judaism was not a representative Church, only a representative of the Church, 4307, 4500; for it acknowledged what was external but not that which was internal.

[2] 'A widow' also means the truth of the Church without its good; for in the representative sense 'a wife' means truth and 'a husband' good, 4823, 4843, and therefore 'a wife without a husband' means the truth of the Church without its good. This being so, when it is said in reference to Tamar that she should remain in the house of her father, the meaning is that the truth of the Church would be alienated, and also that it would not find acceptance in his house, even as the Jewish nation could not accept it because not good but evil was present among that nation.

[3] A widow is referred to many times in the Word; but anyone unacquainted with the internal sense inevitably thinks that 'a widow' means a widow. In the internal sense 'a widow' means the truth of the Church without good, that is, people who have truth that is without good but who nevertheless have a desire for good, who consequently love to be led by good; for 'a husband' means good which ought to take the lead. In the Ancient Church people like these were meant in the good sense by 'the widowed', whether they were women or men. For the Ancient Church distinguished the neighbour to whom charity was to be performed into many separate classes. Some were called the poor, some the wretched and afflicted, some the bound and in prison, some the blind and the lame, and others strangers, orphans, and widows. It performed different charitable works, whichever were appropriate to the character each class possessed. The teachings of that Church showed them what those works were, for that Church had no other teachings than these. Therefore whenever those living in those times either taught or wrote, they did so in conformity with these teachings, so that when they spoke of 'widows' they meant none but the kind of persons among whom truth existed without good but who nevertheless had a desire to be led to good.

[4] From this it is also evident that the teachings of the Ancient Church were ones that had to do with charity and the neighbour, and that all its religious knowledge and factual knowledge existed to enable people to know what was meant spiritually by external things. For the Church was representative of spiritual and celestial things, and therefore it was these spiritual and celestial things, represented and meant by that Church, that people came to know about through the Church's teachings and through its factual knowledge. But those teachings and factual knowledge have become at the present day completely wiped out, so completely indeed that there is no knowledge of their having existed. For their place has been taken by teachings to do with faith which, if widowed and separated from those to do with charity, have virtually nothing to teach. For teachings to do with charity show what good is, but those to do with faith show what truth is. Teaching what truth is without what good is amounts to walking like someone blind, it being good that is the teacher and leader, truth the one that is taught and led. Between the two kinds of teaching there is a vast difference, as great as that between light and darkness. If the darkness is not lightened by means of the light, that is, if truth is not lightened by good, or faith by charity, it is nothing but darkness. For this reason no one knows intuitively, nor consequently by perception, whether truth is the truth; he knows it only from what he was taught and what he absorbed in childhood and substantiated in adult years. This also explains why Churches are so much at variance with one another, one giving the name truth to that which another calls falsity, and are never in agreement.

[5] The meaning in the good sense of 'widows' as people who have truth existing without good but who nevertheless have a desire to be led by good may be seen from places in the Word where widows are mentioned, as in David,

Jehovah who executes judgement for the oppressed, who gives bread to the starving, Jehovah who sets the bound free; Jehovah who opens the blind [eyes]; Jehovah who lifts up the bowed down; Jehovah who loves the righteous; Jehovah who guards sojourners, upholds the orphan and the widow. Psalms 146:7-9.

This refers, in the internal sense, to those whom the Lord furnishes with truths and leads to good. But some of them are called the oppressed, some the starving, while others are called the bound, the blind, the bowed down, sojourners, orphans and widows, each name appropriate to the character of the ones to whom it is applied. No one however can know what each particular nature is except from the internal sense; but the teachings of the Ancient Church showed what any particular nature was. Here, as in many other places, sojourner, orphan, and widow are referred to jointly because 'a sojourner' means those who wish to be furnished with the truths of faith, 1463, 4444, 'an orphan' those with whom good exists without truth but who have a desire to be led to good by means of truth, and 'a widow' those with whom truth exists without good and who have a desire to be led to truth by means of good. These three are referred to jointly here and elsewhere in the Word because in the internal sense they form a single group, for all three together mean those who wish to be taught and to be led to good and truth.

[6] In the same author,

A father of the orphans, and a judge of the widows, is God in the habitation of His holiness. Psalms 68:5.

'The orphans' stands for those with whom, like young children, the good that goes with innocence is present but no truth as yet. The Lord is said to be 'a father' of these because He leads them like a father; He leads them by means of truth into good, that is to say, into the good constituting life or wisdom. 'The widows' stands for those who as adults know the truth but are not as yet doing good. The Lord is said to be 'a judge' of these because He leads them; He leads them by means of good into truth, that is to say, into the truth constituting intelligence. For by 'a judge' a leader is meant. Good without truth, meant by 'an orphan', is made into good filled with wisdom by means of teaching about truth; and truth without good, meant by 'a widow', is made into truth filled with intelligence by means of a life of good.

[7] In Isaiah,

Woe to those decreeing decrees of iniquity, to turn aside the poor from judgement and to carry off into judgement the wretched of My people, so that widows may be their spoil and so that they may make orphans their prey. Isaiah 10:1-2.

Here 'the poor', 'the wretched', 'widows', and 'orphans' do not mean those who are literally so but those who are spiritually such. Now because in the Jewish Church, as in the Ancient, everything was representative, so also was doing good to orphans and widows, for doing good to these represented in heaven charity towards those who are orphans and widows in the spiritual sense.

[8] In Jeremiah,

Do judgement and righteousness, and deliver the plundered out of the hand of the oppressor; and do not defraud the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow, and do not use force, and do not shed innocent blood in this place. Jeremiah 22:3.

Here also 'the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow' means those who are spiritually such. In the spiritual world or heaven they do not know who a sojourner, orphan, or widow is, for the condition of such persons there is not the same as what it had been in the world. When therefore these words are read by man, angels perceive the spiritual or internal meaning they possess.

[9] Similarly in Ezekiel,

Behold, the princes of Israel, each according to his power, ¹ have in you been intent on shedding blood; in you they have treated father and mother with contempt; in you they have dealt with the sojourner by means of oppression; in you they have defrauded the orphan and the widow. Ezekiel 22:6-7.

Also in Malachi,

I will draw near to you to judgement, and I will be a swift witness against the sorcerers, and against those who swear falsely, and against oppressors of the hireling in his wages, of the widow and the orphan, and [against] those who turn aside the sojourner, and do not fear Me. Malachi 3:5.

Similarly in Moses,

You shall not press down a sojourner or oppress him. You shall not afflict any widow or orphan. If you do indeed afflict him, and if he indeed cries out to Me, I will surely hear his cry, and My anger will burn, and I will kill you with the sword, so that your wives become widows, and your children orphans. Exodus 22:21-24.

[10] This, like every other commandment, judgement, and statute in the Jewish Church, was representative. Also, members of that Church were tied down to things of an external nature so that they would observe that command, and by means of their observance of it they represented the inner spirit of charity, even though they themselves had no charity, that is, they did not act from any inner affection. An inner spirit flowed from an affection to furnish with truths those who were without knowledge, and to lead those people to good by means of truths. If they had done this, members of the Jewish Church would have been doing good, in a spiritual sense, to the sojourner, orphan, and widow. But so that what was external might be kept going for the sake of what it represented, the curses declared on Mount Ebal included 'turning aside the judgement of the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow', Deuteronomy 27:19. 'Turning aside the judgement of these' stands for doing the reverse, that is, leading through teaching and life to falsity and evil. Also, because taking goods and truths away from others, and then making them one's own so as to enhance one's own position and gain, was included among curses, the Lord therefore said,

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees! for you devour widows' houses, and for a presence you make long prayers; on account of this you will receive greater condemnation. ² Matthew 23:14; Luke 20:47.

'Devouring widows' houses' stands for taking truths away from those who have a desire for them, and teaching them falsities.

[11] To leave for the sojourner, orphan, and widow that which remained in fields, olivegroves, and vineyards, Deuteronomy 24:19-22, was likewise representative. So too was the command that when they had finished paying the tithes of their produce in the third year, the people should give to the sojourner, orphan, and widow, so that they ate within their gates and were satisfied, Deuteronomy 26:12-13. It being the Lord alone who teaches a person and leads him to good and truth, it is said in Jeremiah,

Leave your orphans, I will keep them alive; and the widows will trust in Me. Jeremiah 49:10-11.

And in Moses,

Jehovah executes judgement for the orphan and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him bread and clothing. Deuteronomy 10:18.

'Bread' stands for the good of love, 2165, 2177, 3478, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217, 4735, and 'clothing' for the truth of faith, 4545, 4763.

[12] It is recorded in 1 Kings 17:1-17 that Elijah was sent, when there was a famine because there was no rain in the land, to a widow in Zarephath. He asked her for a little cake, which she had to make for him first and give it to him; after that she was to make one for herself and her son. When she did so her jar of meal was not used up and her cruse of oil did not run dry. All this was representative, like everything else recorded about Elijah, and in general throughout the Word. 'A famine in the land because there was no rain' represented truth laid waste within the Church, 1460, 3364; 'a widow in Zarephath' those outside the Church who have a desire for truth; 'a cake which she had to make for him first' the good of love to the Lord, 2177, whom, from the very little she had, she was to love above herself and her son. 'The jar of meal' means truth derived from good, 2177, and 'the cruse of oil' charity and love, 886, 3728, 4582. 'Elijah' represents the Word, by means of which such things are effected, 2762.

[13] The same is also meant, in the internal sense, by the Lord's words in Luke,

No prophet is accepted in his own country. In truth, I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, while there was a great famine over the whole land; yet Elijah was sent to none of them, except to a woman - a widow - in Zarephath of Sidon. Luke 4:24-26.

That is, he was sent to those outside the Church who had a desire for truth. But 'widows' within the Church that had been laid waste, to whom Elijah was not sent, are those with whom no truth exists because no good does so; for where there is no good neither is there any truth. However much among those people truth seems to outward appearance like truth it is nothing more so to speak than a shell without any nut in it.

[14] Those among whom this kind of truth exists, also those among whom falsity exists, are meant by 'widows' in the contrary sense, as in Isaiah,

Jehovah will cut off from Israel head and tail, the branch and the bulrush in one day. The old and the honourable in face is the head, and the prophet, the teacher of a lie, the tail. Therefore the Lord will not rejoice over its young men, and He will not have compassion on its orphans and its widows. Isaiah 9:14-15, 17.

In Jeremiah,

I will winnow them with a winnowing-fork in the gates of the land; I will bereave, I will destroy My people; they have not turned from their ways. Their widows are increased to Me more than the sand of the seas. I will bring to them, against the mother of the young men, one who lays waste at midday. She who bore seven languishes; she has breathed her last. Her sun is going down while it is still day. Jeremiah 15:7-9.

In the same prophet,

Our inheritance has been turned over to aliens, our houses to foreigners. We have become orphans with no father; our mothers are widows. Lamentations 5:2-3.

[15] Because 'widows' meant those with whom no truth existed because no good did so, it was therefore shameful for Churches to be called widows, even those Churches governed by falsities springing from evil, as in John,

In her heart she said, A queen I sit, and I am no widow, and shall not see mourning. On account of this in one day will her plagues come, death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned with fire. Revelation 18:7-8.

This refers to Babel. A similar reference to Babel occurs in Isaiah,

Hear this, you lover of pleasures, sitting securely, saying in her heart, I am, and there is no one else like me; a widow I shall not sit, nor shall I know loss of children. But these two things will come to you in a moment in one day - loss of children and widowhood. Isaiah 47:8-9.

[16] From these quotations one may now see what is meant by 'a widow' in the internal sense of the Word. One may see that since 'a widow' represented and consequently meant the truth of the Church without its good - for 'a wife' meant truth and 'a husband' good - priests in the Ancient Churches, in which every single thing was representative, were therefore forbidden to marry any widow who was not a priest's widow, as the following in Moses declares,

The high priest shall take a wife in her virginity; a widow or a woman that has been put away or one defiled or a prostitute, these he shall not take, but a virgin of his own people shall he take as his wife. Leviticus 21:13-15.

And in the references to a new temple and a new priesthood in Ezekiel,

Priests the Levites shall not take as wives for themselves a widow or a woman that has been put away, but virgins from the seed of the house of Israel; but a widow who is the widow of a priest may they take. Ezekiel 44:22.

For 'the virgins' whom they were to marry represented and consequently meant the affection for truth, and 'the widow of a priest' the affection for truth from good, since 'a priest' in the representative sense is the good of the Church. For this reason also any widow [who was the daughter] of a priest and who had no children was allowed to eat some of the offerings or holy things, Leviticus 22:12-13.

[17] Those who belonged to the Ancient Church knew this meaning of 'a widow' from the teachings of the Church, for among them these teachings had to do with love and charity, which included countless matters which at the present day have become completely wiped out. From them they knew which particular kind of charitable act they were required to perform - that is, which service they ought to render towards the neighbour - for those who were called 'widows', for those who were called 'orphans', for those who were called 'sojourners', and so on. From their religious knowledge of truth and from factual knowledge they had a discernment and a knowledge of what the ritual observances of their Church represented and meant. The learned among them knew what it was that things on earth and in this world represented, for they recognized that the whole natural creation was a theatre representative of the heavenly kingdom, 2758, 2989, 2999, 3483. Such knowledge raised their minds up to heavenly things, and the teachings of their Church led the way to life. But after the Church turned aside from charity to faith, more so after it separated faith from charity, and made faith without charity and the works of charity the bringer of salvation, their minds could no longer be raised up by means of religious knowledge to heavenly things, nor be led by any means of the teachings of the Church to life. Indeed the decline has been so great that in the end scarcely anyone believes in a life after death, and scarcely anyone knows anything about heaven. Also, there is no belief at all in the existence of a spiritual sense of the Word which is not visible in the letter. In this way people's minds have become closed.

Footnotes: