Zacchaeus Rises Above the Crowd

1. And [He] entered and passed through Jericho.

2. And behold, [there was] a man called by the name Zacchaeus; and he was the chief publican, and he was rich.

3. And he was seeking to see Jesus, who He is, and could not for the crowd, because he was little of stature.

4. And he ran before and went up into a mulberry fig tree to see Him, for He was about to pass that [way].

5. And when Jesus came upon the place, looking up He saw him, and said to him, Zacchaeus, make haste, step down, for today I must stay at thy house.

6. And making haste, he stepped down, and received Him rejoicing.

7. And seeing, they all murmured, saying that He had come in to repose with a man [that is] a sinner.

8. And Zacchaeus stood, and said to the Lord, Behold, Lord, the half of my belongings I give to the poor, and if I have anything from anyone by extortion, I give back [to him] fourfold.

9. And Jesus said to him, Today salvation has come to pass for this house, because he also is a son of Abraham.

10. For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.

Seeing Jesus

In biblical times, tax collectors were seen as despised traitors who turned against their own people by collecting taxes for the oppressive Roman government. Because of this, tax collectors were regarded as persons with whom righteous people should not be associated. In the previous chapter, for example, when the self-righteous Pharisee said his prayers, it was clear that he saw himself as superior to the tax collector, especially when the Pharisee began his prayer by saying, “I thank you that I am not like other men—extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector” (Luke 18:11). However, when the tax collector prayed, he didn’t compare himself to anyone. Instead, his only words were. “God, be merciful to me, a sinner” (Luke 18:13).

The episode about the Pharisee and the tax collector is followed by a story about a rich ruler who went away sorrowful because he refused to part with his riches; then comes a brief episode about a blind beggar whose eyes were opened. As we have seen, these are not random episodes, but rather they are seamlessly connected. This connection becomes even more clear as we turn to the next episode about a “tax collector” who is “rich” and who very much wants to “see” Jesus (Luke 19:2-3).

The tax collector, whose name is Zacchaeus, is standing in a crowd anticipating the arrival of Jesus who is about to pass through Jericho on His way to Jerusalem. In addition to being a tax collector and being rich, Zacchaeus is also described as being “of little stature”—not tall enough to see above the crowd. Knowing that Jesus is about to pass through Jericho, Zacchaeus climbs up into a tree where he will be able to get a better view of Jesus. He wants to “see” Jesus.

“Seeing,” as we have pointed out, relates to the understanding, and especially to the part of the mind that desires to know the truth because it wants to do good. Therefore, it could be said that Zacchaeus not only wants to get a better view of Jesus, but he also he wants to know who Jesus is, not out of mere curiosity, but out of a genuinely good affection. In this regard, Zacchaeus’ effort to “see who Jesus is” represents the God-given desire implanted in each of us to know God and understand His will. ¹

Zacchaeus’ climbing up into a tree is significant. People who have stood in a large crowd while a parade goes by know the feeling of having their view blocked by the people standing in front of them. Like Zacchaeus, who climbed up into a tree to get a clearer view of Jesus, there are times when we want to “see God,” but cannot get a clear view. We feel a need to get up into a place of higher understanding. Spiritually speaking, this is a place where we can rise above the multitude of confusing thoughts and emotions that crowd out the truth and prevent us from seeing how God works in our lives. And so, Zacchaeus, who wants to see Jesus, finds that higher place by climbing up into a tree. As it is written, Zacchaeus ran ahead and “climbed up” into a sycamore tree to see Jesus (Luke 19:4). ²

Becoming a “son of Abraham”

Zacchaeus’ climbing up into a tree represents the way each of us can rise above our old ways of thinking and responding so that we might be ready for a new view of spiritual reality. In this regard, it should be noted that Zacchaeus climbs up into the tree because he is anticipating that Jesus is “about to pass that way” (Luke 19:4). It is this hopeful anticipation that a new insight is about to pass our way that allows a new understanding to come into our minds. This kind of openness, or readiness to receive the truth, is essential. ³

It is at this point, as Jesus is entering Jerusalem, that He looks up into the tree and sees Zacchaeus. Sensing that Zacchaeus is eager to learn more about Him, Jesus tells him to come down from the tree. As it is written, “When Jesus came to the place, He looked up and saw Zacchaeus, and said to him, ‘Zacchaeus, make haste and step down, for today I must stay at your house” (Luke 19:5). Jesus’ staying at Zacchaeus’ “house” is sacred symbolism. It represents divine truth coming into the human mind. Upon Jesus’ command, Zacchaeus immediately comes down from the tree and receives Jesus “joyfully” (Luke 19:6). ⁴

The crowd, however, is less than joyful. In their minds, Zacchaeus is nothing more than a despicable person who overtaxes them, takes his cut, and sends the rest to Rome—the dominant world power at that time. Zacchaeus is hated not only because he is a tax collector, but even more so because he is Jericho’s “chief tax collector” (Luke 19:2). Therefore, the people murmured among themselves, saying that Jesus “has gone to be a guest with a man who is a sinner” (Luke 19:7).

As we soon discover, there is more to Zacchaeus than simply being a tax collector. Although he is very rich, he gives half of his goods to the poor. Furthermore, if he discovers that he has wronged anyone, he is quick to make amends repaying them fourfold what he owes them. He seems to be a good man, a man who receives Jesus joyfully, and of whom Jesus says, “Today salvation has come to this house, because he is also a son of Abraham” (Luke 19:9).

In referring to Zacchaeus as a “son of Abraham,” Jesus is saying that Zacchaeus is very much a member of the community. As a “son of Abraham,” he shares in their rich lineage, regardless of the fact that he is a tax collector. In the Word, a “son of Abraham” is also referred to as the “seed of Abraham.” In the spiritual sense, a “son of Abraham” is anyone who willingly receives the seeds of goodness and truth that flow in from the Lord. This means that all people can receive the kingdom of God. Ancestry does not matter; social class does not matter. It does not matter whether a person descends from peasants or princes, cobblers or kings. Salvation is for everyone who is open and willing to receive it. And whenever people do so, as does Zacchaeus when he joyfully receives Jesus, they are called “sons of Abraham.” ⁵

The story of Zacchaeus, then, is a symbolic way of expressing the deeper truth that salvation comes to us whenever we are willing to joyfully receive the divine truth, taking it into our minds, just as we would welcome a noble guest into our homes. Zacchaeus’ joyful reception of Jesus is another parable containing the deeper message that God comes to each of us as the divine truth, seeking to save us when we have been lost in a crowd of anxious thoughts and false ideas. All of this is contained in the closing words of this episode where, once again, Jesus speaks about the divine truth as the “Son of Man.” As it is written, “The Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10).

The Parable of the Minas

11. But as they heard these things, He added [and] told a parable, for He was nigh to Jerusalem, and they thought that the kingdom of God was going to appear immediately.

12. He said therefore, A certain noble man went into a distant country, to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.

13. And he called his own ten servants, and gave them ten minas, and said to them, Do business till I come.

14. But his citizens hated him, and sent an embassy after him, saying, We are not willing [that] this [man] should reign over us.

15. And it came to pass that when he had come back, having received the kingdom, he also said [that] these servants should be called to him, to whom he had given the silver, that he might know what every one had gained by doing business.

16. And the first came, saying, Lord, thy mina has earned ten minas.

17. And he said to him, Well [done], thou good servant; because thou hast been faithful in the least, have thou authority over ten cities.

18. And the second came, saying, Lord, thy mina has made five minas.

19. And he said to him also, Be thou also over five cities.

20. And another came saying, Lord, behold, thy mina, which I have held laid up in a napkin.

21. For I feared thee, for thou art an austere man; thou takest what thou placest not, and reapest what thou didst not sow.

22. And he says to him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, wicked servant. Thou didst know that I am an austere man, taking what I placed not, and reaping what I did not sow.

23. Why then gavest not thou my silver to the bank, so that I at my coming might have exacted it with interest?

24. And he said to those that stood by, Take from him the mina, and give [it] to him that has ten minas.

25. And they said to him, Lord, he has ten minas.

26. For I say to you that to everyone that has shall be given; but from him that has not, even that which he has shall be taken away from him.

27. Nevertheless, those enemies of mine that were not willing that I should reign over them, bring [them] hither and slay [them] in front of me.

The previous episode focused on Zacchaeus’ joyful reception of Jesus. In this next episode, Jesus shifts the focus, describing the attitude of those who refuse to welcome His coming. More deeply, it is about those who refuse to welcome the arrival of divine truth when it comes into their lives. As is His usual practice, Jesus does this through the use of a parable.

The parable begins with these words: “Now as they heard these things, He spoke another parable, because He was near Jerusalem and because they thought the kingdom of God would appear immediately” (Luke 19:11). This refers to the fact that most people were expecting that Jesus was about to declare Himself to be the new king of Israel upon entering Jerusalem. Indeed, it was expected that Jesus would be proclaimed the royal successor of David. According to this line of thinking, Jesus was the long-awaited Messiah, the “anointed one” who would receive the kingdom, sit on a throne, and be declared their king. They would no longer be under the rule of the Roman government.

Because Jesus knew that they were thinking in this way, and because He wanted to correct their misunderstanding, He told them a parable beginning with these words: “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and to return” (Luke 19:12). Jesus then adds that the nobleman’s trip would not be entirely successful. As it is written, “The citizens hated him and sent a delegation saying, ‘We will not have this man reign over us’” (Luke 19:13).

Spiritually speaking, the “citizens who hated Him” are those parts of ourselves that do not want to be ruled by the Lord’s divine truth. We prefer to be self-sufficient, relying on ourselves and our own perceptions rather than on the Lord’s leading. Jesus knows that He is headed for Jerusalem where some people will gladly receive Him as king while others will not want “this man” to rule over them.

In the next verse of the parable, it is written that the nobleman “called ten of his servants, delivered to them ten minas, and said to them, ‘Do business till I come’” (Luke 19:13). Each of the ten servants receives one mina, a silver coin equivalent to about three months of wages for manual labor. The parable goes on to describe how the servants “do business” with their silver coins. One returns to the nobleman ten times what he is given, and is promptly rewarded with ten cities to govern. The second returns to the nobleman five times what he is given, and is promptly rewarded with five cities to govern. But the third simply returns to the nobleman the same amount he is given, saying, “Here is your mina which I have kept hidden in a handkerchief. For I feared you, because you are an austere man. You collect what you do not deposit, and reap what you do not sow” (Luke 19:20-21).

This parable is about how God operates within each of us. He gives to each of us knowledge of His will, represented by the silver minas, and He asks us “do business” with that knowledge. That is, He wants us to make good use of that knowledge by putting it into our life. The more we do so, the more that knowledge increases and eventually becomes wisdom. ⁶

As we continue to apply truth to our lives, we gradually acquire the ability to “rule over” greater portions of our life. This means that we gain an increased understanding of spiritual truth which, in turn, allows us to make finer distinctions and have greater happiness in our lives. In the language of sacred scripture, this is represented as having “authority over ten cities,” which refers to gaining a great deal of understanding, while “authority over five cities” represents gaining some understanding. However, if we do nothing with the truth we are given, we will eventually lose it all. As it is written, “Take the mina from him and give it to him who has ten minas … for I say to you that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him” (Luke 19:24-26). ⁷

“Slay those enemies of mine”

At the end of the episode, when the nobleman receives the message saying, “We will not have this man reign over us,” he says, “Bring here those enemies of mine who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me” (Luke 19:27). The truth is that the Lord condemns no one and punishes no one. Therefore, the final words of the nobleman, commanding that his enemies be slain, must have a deeper meaning. Looking back at the lesson of the minas, it is clear that God gives us the knowledge and perception of truth, and also inspires us to live according to it. To that extent the nobleman who gives the silver minas (truths) to his servants represents God in our lives. But it is contrary to reason to imagine that a good God would order people to be slain because they refuse to be governed by Him. This is what an evil tyrant does, not a loving God.

The strong imagery, therefore, is not about what God does to us, but rather it is about what we do to ourselves when we willfully reject God’s reign over us. To have the truth, but not live by it, is destructive. We “slay” something that is precious within us—represented by the loss of the minas.

As a result, our lives become empty and void. Although we still go through the motions of our daily activities, we are spiritually dead. This, then, is the spiritual meaning stored up and contained within the words, “Bring those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.” Spiritually seen, this is saying that we should never allow our lower nature to rule over us. Instead, we should “slay” those enemies within us that reject the Lord’s reign so that the parts of ourselves that are receptive to God’s inflowing love and wisdom can grow. ⁸

The Triumphal Entry

28. And when He had said these things, He went before, going up to Jerusalem.

29. And it came to pass, as He was near to Bethphage and Bethany, at the mountain called [the Mount] of Olives, He sent two of His disciples,

30. Saying, Go ye into the village opposite, in which, on going in, you shall find a colt tied on which no man ever sat; loose him, [and] bring [him].

31. And if anyone ask you, Why do you loose [him]? thus you shall say to him, Because the Lord has need of him.

32. And they that were sent went, and found [it] even as He had said to them.

33. But as they were loosing the colt, his owners said to them, Why do you loosen the colt?

34. And they said, The Lord has need of him.

35. And they brought him to Jesus; and throwing their own garments on the colt, they set Jesus on [him].

36. And as He went, they spread their garments in the way.

37. And when He was already near to the descent of the Mount of Olives, all the multitude of the disciples rejoicing began to praise God with a great voice for all the [works of] power that they had seen,

38. Saying, Blessed [be] the King that comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest!

39. And some of the Pharisees from among the crowd said to Him, Teacher, rebuke Thy disciples.

40. And He answering told them, I say to you, If these should be silent, the stones would cry out.

The story of Zacchaeus is about our readiness to receive divine truth; the parable of the minas is about using that truth in our lives, and the devastation that follows when we deny the Lord and reject the truth. In brief, these two stories contain one of the central messages of the gospels: No one is judging us; we judge ourselves by the free choices that we make. In other words, we can freely choose to joyfully embrace the truth as it comes into our life, as Zacchaeus does, or we can stubbornly reject the truth, as is done by those who say, “we will not have this man reign over us.” ⁹

The idea that someone will “reign over us” is of central significance as we consider the next episode in the series. It is the story of Jesus’ “triumphal entry” into Jerusalem, the fulfillment of ancient prophesy. The idea that the Messiah is coming is creating great excitement among the people. “Could it be Jesus?” they wonder. “Is He the long awaited Messiah who will ‘reign in righteousness’?” (Isaiah 32:1). “Is He the hoped-for king who will ‘reign and prosper and execute judgment in all the earth,’ the one who will ‘save Judah’ and ‘keep Israel safe’?” (Jeremiah 23:5-6). These ancient prophesies are still very much in the minds of the people as they line the streets of Jerusalem, awaiting the beginning of the new kingdom—a new Jerusalem. Many of the people believe that it will occur when Jesus rides into Jerusalem, establishes Himself as their new king, and “executes the judgment” that will lead them to victory over their natural enemies.

This very literal idea—that the kingdom of God will come in a particular place (Jerusalem) at a particular time (when Jesus rides in)—is a misunderstanding of Jesus’ deeper mission. In fact, He has already told His disciples that “the kingdom of God does not come with observation” (17:20). Nevertheless, there is still a great truth contained within the story of the triumphal entry—a truth about how God comes into our lives as the divine truth, and how we can receive that truth, with shouts of triumph, when it comes.

The story of Jesus’ triumphal entry begins with the words, “When He had said this, He went up to Jerusalem” (Luke 19:28). The phrase “up to Jerusalem,” is significant. The temple stood there; it was the place where religion was taught, and rituals were performed. In most people’s minds, therefore, the name “Jerusalem’ was synonymous with religious life, doctrine, faith, and worship. Isaiah calls it “the holy city” (52:1), and Jeremiah calls it “the throne of Jehovah” (3:17). Seen more deeply, the picture of Jesus going “up to Jerusalem” depicts God finding His rightful place at the center of our lives, leading us according to His divine truth. He is, so to speak, “sitting on his throne” within us, ruling our inner lives. This is what happens whenever we choose to “go up” from a literal understanding of scripture and rise to a higher level. ¹⁰

As the people continue to line the streets of Jerusalem, hopes ring high and the questions continue: “Is this the promised return of the Messiah?” “Will Jesus be received as Israel’s true king?” “Will He usher in the long-awaited, much anticipated, kingdom of God?” But before doing anything that might answer these questions, Jesus says to His disciples, “Go into the village and you will find a colt tied on which no one has ever sat. Loose him and bring him here” (Luke 19:30). The disciples obey Jesus. And when they find the colt, they “throw their own garments on the colt, and set Jesus on him” (Luke 19:35).

These details, like the symbolism of going “up to Jerusalem,” are significant. The prophets had foretold that when the Messiah would come into Jerusalem, He would make His entry in just this way. As it is written through the prophet Zechariah, “Rejoice, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; he is just and having salvation, lowly and riding on a colt, the foal of a donkey” (Zechariah 9:9). In keeping with Zechariah’s prophecy, Jesus arranges to enter Jerusalem riding on a colt, the foal of a donkey.

Jesus’ actions were not merely to fulfill scripture, but also to teach deeper lessons about spiritual reality. In Matthew it was stated that Jesus came into Jerusalem riding on both a colt and a she-ass (a female donkey). But in Luke we find that only the colt is mentioned. The detail about a colt upon which no one has ever ridden, represents an understanding that is still pure and open, uncorrupted by false teachings and self-interest. And the absence of the she-ass, which represents natural affections, reminds us once again that Luke focuses our attention on things of the understanding rather than things of the will. Jesus will, therefore, ride into Jerusalem not only on a colt, but upon a colt that no one else has ever ridden.

In sacred scripture, beasts of burden, whether they be donkeys, asses, or colts signify various aspects of the understanding. Because these animals are typically used for carrying burdens, they represent the use of the memory, which carries information. But when used for riding, especially when they carry judges and kings, they represent rationality. In this case, when Jesus is seated upon the colt, it represents the subordination of our rationality to God’s leading. ¹¹

Similarly, the garments which the disciples placed on the colt and spread on the road, also signify aspects of the understanding. In sacred scripture, “garments” signify truth. Just as clothing protects our bodies, truth protects our spirit. While the disciples may not have understood the deeper significance of what they were doing, their actions nevertheless embody eternal truths. ¹²

As Jesus enters Jerusalem riding on a colt, the drama rises to a crescendo. As it is written, “The whole multitude of the disciples began to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice” (Luke 19:37). Quoting from the Hebrew scriptures, they cry out, “Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord” (Psalms 118:26). And they add, “Peace in heaven and glory in the highest” (Luke 19:38). The Pharisees, meanwhile, are outraged at the commotion. The very idea that Jesus is about to be made the new king of Israel, appalls them. So, they call out to Jesus, asking Him to restrain the enthusiasm of His disciples: “Teacher,” they say, “rebuke Your disciples” (Luke 19:39). But Jesus does not. Instead, Jesus says to them, “I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out” (Luke 19:40).

Stones, because of their hardness and durability, symbolize the unbreakable nature of truth. It is truth that gives stability and constancy to our character. It is truth that turns us from being a feather in the wind, swayed by conflicting opinions and vacillating between viewpoints, to a person of steadfast conviction. Stones, then, throughout the Word, signify those central, fundamental truths that help us to become unshakeable people of principle. These are the rock-solid truths we have received from the Lord, truths that we will not allow to remain silent. These are the truths that we joyfully proclaim to the extent that we welcome divine truth into our minds and allow it to reign over us. In sacred scripture this is seen as Jesus coming into Jerusalem where He will become king, the ruler of our inner lives. And this is why the “stones,” signifying the truths that we have learned from Him, cannot keep silent. ¹³

Jesus Weeps over Jerusalem

41. And when He was near, seeing the city, He wept over it,

42. Saying, O that thou hadst known, even thou, and indeed, in this thy day, the things [which belong] to thy peace! But now they are hidden from thine eyes.

43. For the days shall come upon thee, and thine enemies shall cast a rampart around thee, and shall surround thee, and shall beset thee on every side;

44. And they shall lay thee level with the ground, and thy children within thee, and they shall not leave in thee stone upon stone; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

As Jesus rides into Jerusalem, the people are filled with joy. But Jesus is filled with a very different emotion. The nearer He comes to the city of Jerusalem, the sadder He becomes. As it is written, “As He was near, seeing the city, He wept over it” (Luke 19:41). The cause of His weeping is explained in the next verse where He addresses the people of Jerusalem and says, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes” (Luke 19:42). Just moments before, the disciples were under the assumption that they were about to experience “peace in heaven and glory in the highest” (Luke 19:38); but they are thinking of a different kind of peace (victory over natural enemies) and a different kind of glory (being able to rule over other nations).

Aware of their misunderstanding, Jesus weeps and says, “If you had known … the things that make for your peace.” Once again, we are reminded that they could not see or understand the things that truly make for peace. As Jesus put it, “They are hidden from your eyes.” Here again, these references to sight remind us that we are dealing with the understanding. Jesus weeps when he “sees” the city; He says, “If you had ‘known’ these things. And He adds, “But these things are hidden from your ‘eyes.’”

As we have already seen, in sacred scripture, a “house” signifies our individual understanding. It can be a “house of bondage” when it is faulty,” or a “house of the Lord” when it is filled with truth. Similarly, a “city” signifies a complete system of understanding—a belief system that brings together many thoughts, ideas, and beliefs, as in a city filled with houses. If these beliefs are well-organized and true, it is described as “city set on a hill” and as a “holy city.” But when these beliefs are devoid of truth, it is called a “city of emptiness” (Isaiah 24:10) and a “bloody city” (Ezekiel 22:2; Nahum 3:1). Jesus knows that a false belief system can never lead to true peace. It can only lead to states of unrest, anxiety, and misery. ¹⁴

It is no wonder, then, that when Jesus “sees the city” whose inhabitants collectively believe that their happiness consists solely in material prosperity, He weeps, saying, “The things that make for your peace are hidden from your eyes.” Jesus then goes on to make a dire prediction. It is a warning about what can happen to people when they place their trust in earthly success rather than in heavenly blessings. As Jesus puts it, “The days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment around you, and surround you, and close you in on every side, and level you, and your children within you, to the ground” (Luke 19:43-44).

This is an accurate historical prophecy; four decades later, Jerusalem was leveled, the temple was destroyed, and many of the inhabitants were killed. Jesus is also speaking about spiritual reality. As long as we believe that happiness consists in the security we find in having material possessions and the glory we experience when conquering others, we are headed for ruin. Our spiritual enemies—anger, revenge, cruelty, resentment, pride, and lust, along with anxiety, fear, discouragement, and despair—will surround us on every side, and will cause us untold suffering. So great will be our distress that we will not know what to believe or be able to understand what is true. As Jesus puts it, “there will not be one stone left upon another” (Luke 19:44).

This is what happens whenever we forget that the kingdom of God is not in space and time; it is within us. It is flowing in at every moment in the form of Divine Love and Divine Wisdom, and is available to us in as great or as small a measure as we are willing to receive. This is the real coming of the Lord. The time is now, and the place is here, but we seldom realize this. That is why this brief episode ends with these words of lament, spoken by Jesus: “You did not know the time of your visitation” (Luke 19:44).

A practical application

This episode concludes with the lament, “You did not know the time of your visitation.” In sacred scripture, “visitation” refers to the coming of divine truth into our life. If we are open to the reception of divine truth because we have a good heart and want to become the best people we can be, this “time of visitation” will be a welcome one. But if we are inclined to go our own way, and do our own thing, without regard for divine truth, the Lord’s “visitation” will be seen as a threat and as a condemnation. What is your state of reception when a new truth comes to you, perhaps even in the form of a criticism? Do you see it as a judgment that condemns you, or as a light that can reveal your blind spots and lead you out of darkness? With this in mind, be on the lookout for new truth as it comes into your life, especially through the inner meaning of the Word. Receive it as Zacchaeus did, as a royal visit from the King of Kings.

Jesus Visits the Temple

45. And He came into the temple, and began to cast out those that sold therein, and those that bought,

46. Saying to them, It is written, My house is a house of prayer, but you have made it a cave of robbers.

47. And He taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the first of the people sought to destroy Him,

48. And could not find what they might do, for all the people hung upon Him to hear [Him].

Visitation is not necessarily a joyous event. When we are “visited” by a new truth, it can be disconcerting. In fact, once we realize our enslavement to our old habits and false ideas, it may cause a major upheaval in our lives. This is pictured in the next episode as Jesus enters the temple in Jerusalem: “Then He went into the temple and began to cast out those who bought and sold in it” (Luke 19:45). ¹⁵

On the literal level, this scene occurs at the temple in Jerusalem where rampant commercialism has made a parody of true worship. The problem is nothing new. Jesus quotes from the prophet Jeremiah who lived centuries before, saying, “It is written, ‘My house is a house of prayer,’ but you have made it ‘a den of thieves’” (Luke 19:46).

On a deeper level, “the temple at Jerusalem” is our own mind. While it should be a “house of prayer,” it can also be a “den of thieves.” These thieves are the false thoughts that invade our minds, robbing us of the truth and filling us with lies. Therefore, when Jesus comes into the temple of our minds as new truth—a new understanding of how to love God and serve others—a combat ensues. The thieves and robbers within us, hating to be discovered and dethroned, fight back, for they are unwilling to surrender their ground. If we realize, however, that this is “the time of our visitation,” we will understand that the Lord is coming into our lives to cast out falsity so that we can receive instruction from Him. As it is written, “He was teaching daily in the temple” (Luke 19:47). ¹⁶

Paying heed to the many ways the Lord is leading and teaching us from moment to moment is vital to spiritual growth, and especially crucial during times of spiritual combat. On the one hand “the chief priests, the scribes, and the leaders of the people sought to destroy Him” (Luke 19:47). That is, there are parts of ourselves that are not ready or willing to receive instruction. But if we stay focused on what Jesus is teaching us, we will be kept safe. In this regard we read that the priests, scribes, and leaders “were unable to do anything; for all the people were very attentive to hear Him” (Luke 19:48).

A practical application

When the Lord comes into the temple, He casts out those who are buying and selling in what should have been a “house of prayer.” Once we identify the falsities that arise from the self-interested “buyers and sellers” in our own minds, the Lord can help us cast them out. Only then can we begin to focus on what we need to learn from Him. As long as we do this, “being very attentive” to the Lord’s words, the negative tendencies of our lower nature will have no power over us. We will be free to focus our attention on becoming the kind of person the Lord is teaching us to be. As it written through the prophet Isaiah, “Cease to do evil; learn to do good” (Isaiah 1:16-17). ¹⁷

Footnotes:

48. At this point I shall insert the following account of an experience. ¹

Once I had a talk with two angels, one from the eastern and one from the southern heaven. When they perceived that I was pondering the mysteries of wisdom on the subject of love, they said: 'Don't you know anything about the contests of wisdom in our world?' 'Not yet,' I replied.

'There are many of them,' they said, adding that those who love truths with a spiritual affection, that is, love them because they are truths and are the way to wisdom, meet when the signal is given, to discuss matters requiring profound understanding and form conclusions about them.

They then took me by the hand saying, 'Come with us, and you will see and hear. The signal has been given for a meeting to-day.'

I was taken across a plain to a hill, at the foot of which there was an avenue of palm trees extending all the way to the top. We went into it and climbed the hill. On the top or summit of the hill we saw a wood, among the trees of which a rise in the ground formed a sort of theatre. Inside this was a flat space paved with pebbles of different colours, and around this were ranged seats in a square; these were occupied by the lovers of wisdom. In the middle of the theatre was a table, and a document secured with a seal lay on it.

[2] Those who were sitting on the seats invited us to occupy some which were still vacant, but I replied: 'I have been brought here by two angels to see and listen, not to take part in the session.'

Then the two angels went up to the table in the middle of the arena and broke the seal on the document; they then read out to the meeting the mysteries of wisdom written in the document, which they were to discuss and expound. It had been written by angels of the third heaven, and sent down to lie on the table. There were three mysteries: the first, 'What is the image of God and the likeness of God in which man was created?', the second, 'Why is man born without knowledge of what he should love, yet animals and birds, the highest as well as the lowest, are born knowing all their loves require?'; the third, 'What is the meaning of "the tree of life," "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil," and "eating of them"?'

Underneath was written: 'Link these three subjects into a single statement of opinion, and write it on a fresh sheet of paper; then replace it on this table, and we shall look at it. If the opinion appears well-balanced and fair, each of you will be awarded a prize for wisdom.' After reading this out the two angels went away and rose up into their own heavens.

Then those taking part in the session began to discuss and expound the mysteries set before them. They spoke in turn, beginning with those who sat on the north side, then those who sat on the west, then the south and finally the east. They took up the first subject for discussion, which was: 'What is the image of God and what is the likeness of God in which man was created?' First of all the following passages were read aloud from the Book of Creation:

God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and God created man in His own image, to be an image ² of God He made him, Genesis 1:26-27.

On the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God, Genesis 5:1.

[3] Those who sat on the north side were the first to speak. They said that the image and the likeness of God are the two lives breathed into man by God, the life of the will and the life of the understanding. 'For we read,' they said,

Jehovah God breathed into Adam's nostrils the breath of lives ³ , and man became a living soul, Genesis 2:7.

This seems to mean that the will to do good and the perception of truth was breathed into him, which could be called the breath of lives. And because life was breathed into him by God, image and likeness mean his uprightness arising from love and wisdom, and from righteousness and the powers of judgment present in him.'

Those who sat on the west side supported this view, with, however, this addition, that the state of uprightness breathed into Adam by God, is constantly breathed into every person after Adam; but it is present in man as it were in a receiver, and a person is an image and likeness of God in accordance with his effectiveness as a receiver.

[4] Then the third group, who sat on the south side, said: 'The image of God and the likeness of God are two separate things, but in man they are combined from his creation. Some kind of inward illumination shows us that the image of God can be destroyed by man, but not His likeness. This is visible as it were through a screen from the fact that

Adam retained the likeness of God, after he had lost the image of God. For we read after his cursing:

See, man is as one of us, knowing good and evil, Genesis 3:22.

and afterwards he is called a likeness of God, but not an image of God (Genesis 5:1). But we would leave our colleagues on the east, who are therefore in better illumination, to say what the image of God and the likeness of God properly are.'

[5] Then, when there was silence, those who sat on the east side rose from their seats and looked up to the Lord. Then they sat down again and said that an image of God was a receiver of God, and since God is Love itself and Wisdom itself, the image of God is the receiving of love and wisdom from God in the man; but the likeness of God was the perfect likeness and complete appearance of love and wisdom being present in man and of belonging to him. 'For man does not know but that he loves and is wise of himself, or that he wills good and understands truth of himself. In fact not a whit is of himself, but from God. It is only God who loves of Himself and is wise of Himself, because God is Love itself and Wisdom itself. The likeness or appearance that love and wisdom, or good and truth, are present in man as if they belonged to him is what makes a man human, and thus able to be linked to God and so to live for ever. The consequence of this is that man's humanity is the result of his ability to will good and understand truth exactly as if he did so of himself, while at the same time knowing and believing that he does so from God. For to the extent that he knows and believes this, God places His image in man; it would be otherwise if he believed it was of himself and not from God.'

[6] After saying this, their love of truth made zeal overcome them and this led them to say: 'How can a person receive any love and wisdom, keep it and reproduce it, unless he feels that it is his own? And how can he be linked with God by love and wisdom, unless he is granted some reciprocal function to permit linking? No linking is possible without reciprocation, and the reciprocal function is man's loving God and doing His will, as if he acted of himself, yet believing that these things come from God. Again, how can a man live for ever, unless he is linked to the everlasting God? So how can a person be human, without that likeness in him?'

[7] All applauded this speech and asked for a conclusion to be drawn from what had been said. The following statement was adopted: 'Man is a receiver of God, and a receiver of God is an image of God. Because God is Love itself and Wisdom itself, man is a receiver of both of these. The receiver becomes an image of God to the extent that he receives them. Man is a likeness of God by virtue of the fact that he feels in himself that what he receives from God is his as if it belonged to him. But still that likeness makes him an image of God to the extent that he acknowledges that the love and wisdom, or good and truth, in him are not his, and do not come from him, but are present only in God and therefore come from Him.

[8] They then took up the next subject for discussion, 'Why is man born without knowledge of what he should love, yet animals and birds, the highest as well as the lowest, are born knowing all their loves require?'

First they established the truth of the proposition by various observations. For instance that man is born without any knowledge, not even knowing about conjugial love. ⁴ They made enquiry and heard from researchers that a baby does not even know its mother's breast from birth, but learns about it by having it repeatedly offered by its mother or nurse; it only knows how to suck, and that is because it has learnt this by continually sucking in its mother's womb. Later on, it does not know how to walk, or to adapt the sounds it makes to form any human word, not even how to express its emotions by sounds as animals do. Moreover, it does not know what food is suitable for it, as animals do, but grabs anything it finds, whether clean or dirty, and puts it in its mouth. The researchers reported that without instruction man knows nothing of the manner of sexual intercourse, and not even young men and women know about this without being told by others. In short, a man is born a mere bodily being like a worm, and bodily he remains unless he learns from others to know, understand and be wise.

[9] They then established that both the higher and lower animals, such as land animals, the birds of the air, reptiles, fish and insects, are born knowing all their loves require in order to live; for instance, everything they need to know about feeding, about where to live, how to copulate and produce young, and about how to bring up their young. They established these facts by remarkable observations which they recalled to mind from what they had seen, heard and read during their previous life in the natural world, where the animals that exist are not representative but real. When they had fully approved the truth of the proposition, they turned their minds to seeking and finding the reasons which would allow them to explain and elucidate this mystery. They all asserted that it must inevitably be due to the Divine Wisdom, that a man is a man and an animal an animal, and thus the imperfection in the birth of man becomes his perfection, and the perfection in the birth of an animal is its imperfection.

[10] The northerners then began to state their opinion. They said that man is born without knowledge, so that he can receive all kinds of knowledge. But if he acquired these by birth, he could never receive any others than those he acquired by birth, and then neither could he make any his own. They illustrated this by a simile. Man at birth is like soil in which no seeds have been planted, but which can receive every kind of seed, grow them and bring them to fruiting. But an animal is like soil which has already been sown, filled with grass and plants, and unable to receive any seeds other than those implanted. If others were sown, it would choke them. That is the reason why it takes man many years to grow up, a period long enough to allow him to be cultivated like the soil, and to bring forth, so to speak, all kinds of crops, flowers and trees. An animal, however, takes only a few years, because it does not need time to be cultivated to produce anything but what it possesses from birth.

[11] The westerners spoke next. They said that man has by birth, not knowledge like an animal, but ability and inclination, the ability to know and the inclination to love. He has by birth not only the ability [to know, but also to understand and to be wise. Also he is born with the most perfect inclination not only] ⁵ to love what is his own and worldly, but also what is God's and heavenly. As a result man is born an organ which lives with difficulty and dimly by its external senses, and he has by birth no internal senses, so that he may by stages acquire life and become first a natural man, then a rational and finally a spiritual man. This would not happen, if he were endowed by birth with knowledge and loves, like animals. For inborn knowledge and affections of love limit that progress, but mere abilities and inclinations can be inborn without limiting it. Consequently man is capable of becoming more perfect in knowledge, intelligence and wisdom for ever.

[12] The Southerners followed on with their statement. They said that it is impossible for man to acquire any knowledge from himself, but he must do so from others, since he has no inborn knowledge. 'Since he cannot acquire any knowledge from himself, neither can he acquire any love, since where there is no knowledge, there is no love. Knowledge and love are inseparable companions, and can no more be divided than will and understanding, or affection and thought, indeed no more than essence and form. Therefore as a person acquires knowledge from others, so love attaches itself to him as his companion. The universal love which attaches itself is the love of knowing, and later on the loves of understanding and being wise. Only man has these loves, animals have none; they flow in from God.

[13] 'We agree with our colleagues on the west that man has by birth no love and consequently no knowledge, but only the inclination to love, and consequently the ability to receive knowledge, not from himself, but from others, that is, by way of others. We say "by way of others," because neither have they received anything from themselves, but in origin all knowledge is from God. We also agree with our colleagues on the north that man immediately at birth is like soil in which no seeds have been planted, but where fine as well as worthless seeds can be planted. That is why man (homo) is so called from soil (humus), and is called Adam from adama, which means soil. ⁶ We would add that animals have by birth natural loves, and consequently the kinds of knowledge that correspond to them, yet this knowledge does not enable them to know, think, understand and be wise, but they are guided to this knowledge by their loves, almost like blind people being guided through the streets by dogs. As far as their understanding is concerned, they are blind, or rather, like sleepwalkers who do what they do by blind knowledge while the understanding is asleep.'

[14] The last to speak were the easterners. 'We are in agreement,' they said, 'with what our brothers have said, that man knows nothing from himself, but only from others and by way of others, so that he may recognise and acknowledge that all he knows, understands and is wise about he owes to God. Man could not in any other way be born and be created by God, and become His image and likeness. For he becomes an image of God by his acknowledgment and belief that he has received and continues to receive all the good of love and charity and all the truth of wisdom and faith from God, and not a whit from himself. He is a likeness of God by his feeling these things in himself as if from himself. He has this feeling because he has no knowledge from birth, but receives different kinds of knowledge, and it seems to him as if he received them from himself. Man is permitted by God to have this feeling so that he should be a man and not an animal, since by willing, thinking, loving, knowing, understanding and being wise as if from himself he receives different kinds of knowledge and sublimates them into intelligence, and by using them into wisdom. Thus God links man to Himself, and man links himself to God.

These things could not happen if God had not provided that man was born in a state of complete ignorance.'

[15] After this statement there was a general move to draw a conclusion from the matters discussed, and the following was adopted. 'Man is born without any knowledge so that he can acquire knowledge of all kinds and advance to intelligence and through this to wisdom. He is born without any loves so that he can acquire all kinds of loves, by putting to use his knowledge derived from his intelligence, and acquire love to God by means of love towards the neighbour. Thus he may be linked with God and so become fully man and live forever.'

[16] Then they took up the document again and read out the third subject for discussion. This was: 'What is the meaning of "the tree of life," "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil," and "eating of them"?' They all begged those on the east to expound this mystery, since it required a more profound understanding, and those who are from the east enjoy a flame-like light, that is, the wisdom of love. This wisdom is what is meant by "the Garden of Eden," in which those two trees were placed.

'We will tell you.' they replied, 'but since man gets nothing from himself, but from God, we shall draw our statement from God, but still speak as if it were we ourselves who were speaking. "A tree,' they went on to say, "Means man, and its fruit the good of life. So "the tree of life" means a man who has life from God. And since love and wisdom, charity and faith, or good and truth make up life from God in man, "the tree of life" means the man who has these qualities from God, and thus everlasting life. "The tree of life" from which people will be given to eat (Revelation 2:7; 22:2, 14) has a similar meaning.

[17] "‘The tree of the knowledge of good and evil" means a man who believes that he has life from himself, and not from God; and so, that love and wisdom, charity and faith, that is, good and truth in him are his and not God's. He believes this because in what he thinks and wills, says and does, he seems and appears to behave exactly as if he did so of himself. So since he goes so far as to persuade himself that he is God, the serpent said:

God knows that on the day you eat of the fruit of that tree your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil,Genesis 3:5.

[18] "Eating" from those trees means receiving and making one's own. "Eating of the tree of life" means receiving everlasting life; "eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" means receiving damnation. "The serpent" means the devil, a personification of self-love and pride in one's own intelligence. Self-love is the owner of that tree, and people who are proud of that love are those trees. It is therefore a huge error if people believe that Adam was wise and did good of himself, and this was his uncorrupted state, when in fact Adam himself was cursed for holding that belief. For this is the meaning of "eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." He therefore fell from his uncorrupted state, which he had by virtue of his belief that he was wise and did good entirely from God and in no respect of himself; for this is what "eating of the tree of life" means. Only the Lord, during His life on earth, had wisdom from Himself and did good of Himself, because the Divine itself was in Him and was His from birth. Therefore by His own power He became the Redeemer and Saviour.'

[19] From both these points they reached the following conclusion: ‘"The tree of life" and "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" and "eating of them" mean that life for a person is having God in him, and then he enjoys heaven and everlasting life; and that it is death for a person to be persuaded and believe that life for a man is not God but himself, for thus he finds hell and everlasting death, in other words, damnation.'

[20] Then they looked at the document the angels had left on the table and read the words written at the bottom: 'Link these subjects into a single opinion.' Then they brought the three subjects together and saw that they hung together in a single series. This series or opinion was as follows: 'Man has been created so that he may receive love and wisdom from God, yet it appears exactly as if he did so from himself, which is to allow him to receive them and so be linked; therefore man is born without any love or any knowledge, without even the ability to love and be wise of himself; therefore if he attributes all the good of love and all the truth of wisdom to God he becomes a living man, but if he attributes them to himself he becomes a dead man.'

They wrote these words on a fresh sheet of paper and laid it on the table. Suddenly the angels appeared in a shining cloud and carried the document off to heaven. When it had been read there, those who sat on the seats heard the words, Well done, well done, well done. At once there appeared one as it were flying; he had two wings at his feet and two more at his temples. He brought as prizes gowns, hats and laurel-wreaths. He came down and gave those who sat on the north gowns of iridescent colour; to those on the west gowns of scarlet; to those on the south hats decorated at the rim with bands of gold and pearls, and on the raised left side with diamonds cut into the shape of flowers. To those on the east he gave laurel-wreaths decorated with rubies and sapphires. All who had taken part in the contest of wisdom went cheerfully home resplendent in their prizes.

Footnotes: